tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21075867.post8175759185367937982..comments2022-03-26T22:20:24.739+11:00Comments on The Natural Philosopher: Generous readingMick Popehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04350141366747415908noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21075867.post-19789586335583444242009-10-24T14:30:23.340+11:002009-10-24T14:30:23.340+11:00Mick, sounds like a good approach. can u send me y...Mick, sounds like a good approach. can u send me your review when done by email?<br />Thx, Ron ChoongAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21075867.post-55615237474457563932008-05-21T00:55:00.000+10:002008-05-21T00:55:00.000+10:00anonymous,You seem to be taking a very fundamental...anonymous,<BR/><BR/>You seem to be taking a very fundamentalist Protestant approach to biblical scripture. Surely, Adi Da would disapprove.Agnikanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00494537340737199409noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21075867.post-24647848427207052892008-05-13T18:49:00.000+10:002008-05-13T18:49:00.000+10:00But what is there is no (zilch) truth whatsoever i...But what is there is no (zilch) truth whatsoever in the usual stories re Saint Jesus of Galilee.<BR/><BR/>Or put in another way, what if "jesus" is just the main character in a piece of imaginative fictional story-telling?<BR/><BR/>No more real than the character named Krishna in the Baghavad Gits, or Bart Simpsons shorts?<BR/><BR/>How can someone who is a "natural" scientist possibly subscribe to the "resurrection of jesus". <BR/><BR/>Such an "event" is/was TOTALLY unprovable by ANY kind of reasoning.<BR/><BR/>And NEVER happened!<BR/><BR/>1. www.dabase.org/exochrist.htm <BR/>2. www.dabase.org/proofch6.htm#idol <BR/>3. www.dabase.org/christmc2.htm <BR/>4. www.dabase.org/broken.htm <BR/>5. www.dabase.org/rgcbpobk.htm <BR/>6. www.realgod.orgAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com